Robotics is a big trend. As examples, you have the 4D printers, cameras, lawn mowers, washing machine, irons and computers.

In our world there are already a lot of robots. Robots are important and necessary in our general day life. Robots save lives in hospitals, do the jobs of people, improve the farming and fight our wars. This trend is still growing and will continue to grow. Unfortunately, there is a chance that robots are taking over many jobs and people will get fired or maybe worst have no function anymore. There are even people who think robots will take over the world. Like in the movie Wall-e from Pixar, I-Robot or X-men.


Robotics is a trend because of its huge impact to the world. And this will become even more. Robotics is increasing so hard that people begin asking the question: ‘Is it possible to make more robots that are smarter than we are, or is this even possible?’ 1)

Robots are already used for a lot of household stuff. In 2015 consumers spoke to be ready for a more personal robot. On September 2014 a Consumer Preference Survey about Robotics was answered by a lot of people. The result showed that the consumer is willing to spend $3,000 at a personal robot. This robot will helping with more specific household choirs, like doing the laundry, cooking, driving and even just for company at home. A conclusion is that people are already using robots in the house and want them more. 2)

The main consumer need of robotics is taking place for many tasks from people. Carlie The Robot for example, is a robot that is teaching children with a handicap or autism. The robot is a humanoid and around the $400,000. Topcliffe Primary in Birmingham is the first school which uses this robot. The robot has, unlike the teachers, no emotions, feelings, expressions nor responses. That is why the robots are more useful for autistic children to understand and relate to.


Not only teaching is taking place by robots also jobs which are dangerous or that take too much time and effort. To use a robot instead of hiring persons is much cheaper for companies. We want to have everything the easy way and with robots this is possible. That is why the mesotrend of robots is getting bigger and bigger. 3)


Robotics has also many microtrends. One example is the drone-camera. A self-flying drone is a camera that has one of the highest number of pixels, cloud processing and data you can use for Autodesk. It is a flying robot normally used for search and rescue, surveillance, monitoring, weather and many more. The robot is already a must for many jobs. Personal drones are today also becoming popular. Often for movies or photography etc. In the near future, drones will maybe even be used for delivery. 4)




There are men who warn other people that robots will take all our jobs. Robots have already taken over many jobs within 30 years. Prof Moshe said that the rise of robots could lead to unemployment rates bigger than 50 %. Vardo, prof in computational engineering said, “We are approaching a time when machines will be able to outperform humans at almost any task.” This will mean that there are no tasks left for people and we will not have a function anymore. Is professor Vardo right? Will robots take over all our jobs? Or even worse, will robots become smarter than people and maybe take over the world? 5)


1) Bob Gourley, ‘Tracking the Megatrend of Robotics’, 23-08-16


2) RBR Staff, ‘CES 2015: What Kinds of Robots Will People Actually Buy?’, 09-01-15


3)Ellie Zolfagharifard, ‘The robot that makes EYE-CONTACT: Charlie could help bridge the gap between man and machine by copying our behaviour’, 23-04-14


4) Margaret Rouse, ‘Drone’, 02-08-15


5) Sarah Knapton, ‘Robots will take over most jobs within 30 years, experts warn’ 13-02-16



2 thoughts on “Robotics

  1. (I’m a resitter so therefore the late response)

    Very interesting topic, the most relevant topic of today in my opinion which is why I like talking about it. I found the topics on which people want robots to help them out interesting and generally everything you have been claiming in this article is something I would agree with. However, there are many takes on this issue from many different scientists.

    For example, editor, writer and technology guru Kevin Kelly is convinced that we will have a “second industrial revolution” of some sort in the future. But instead of machines, it will be digital brains that will control the machines. He believes however that these artificial intelligences (AI) will assist people with their jobs in the future rather than replace them.
    I personally think that would happen in the first place, for example a web designer would generate a web design with an AI and tweak it themselves to their liking. Or a painter would have a robot that could assist them in having the right paint within reach at the right times.

    There will be a point though in which robots will be as smart as people, also called “point of singularity”. In which robots will think like us, except they learn thousands of times faster than we do since they’re electric. At this point we don’t know what will happen exactly. People like Oxford professor and philosopher Nick Bostrom for example think we should be very afraid of this, because it represents a point on which we are at mercy of these cold, emotionless robots.
    Kelly and Bostrom have two different viewpoints on this, one is positive, the other is really dark.

    Which one is right? Are they both right?

    Timo van Vliet 1645312

    Kevin Kelly (2016) How AI can bring on a second Indrustrial Revolution, retrieved on:

    Tim Adams (2016), Artificial Intelligence: ‘we’re like children playing with a bomb’, retrieved on:


  2. This topic is really important for our future these days. Robots will have taken over most jobs within 30 years leaving humanity facing its ‘biggest challenge ever’ to find meaning in life when work is no longer necessary than ever. By facing this problem we need to find a way to fill in our lives.

    The question I want to put forward is, Does the technology we are developing ultimately benefit mankind? A typical answer is that if machines will do all our work, we will be free to pursue leisure activities. But is this all that we want? This time we all work hard to find ways to replace all the work by robots, but instead of making it better we are working ourselves into trouble, by replacing ourselves in the community in the future. Only because in business terms robots works that much faster than humans so it will be cheaper by replacing them(S. Knapton, 2016).

    After reading all this, I wondered why we are doing this? Please stop doing research into robots and invest in problems like plastic in the sea or other world problems that can help the earth by living longer.

    S. Knapton(February 2016) Robots will take over most jobs within 30 years, experts warn. Retrieved on 20-10-2017, on Telegraph:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s